Interests protected by parquet and access to justice

Abstract

Some time ago, though still nowadays, especially in a society with large socioeconomic ills, appreciation and promotion of access to justice through class actions broadly, sponsored by the state prosecutor, it is the subject of doctrinal and jurisprudential debate. Thus, based on the dynamic and changing interests in question, the vehicle, in casu, the class actions, and its driver, the state prosecutor, also advanced to reach any socially relevant interests. This article aims to discuss the analysis of relevant topics currently covered by the state Public Prosecutor’s Office in public civil action. Based on this premise, it will be argued that interests possessing social relevance, regardless of whether they are diffuse, collective stricto sensu, individual homogeneous, available or unavailable, could be the subject of a Public Civil Action sponsored by parquet. It
was found that as long as it has social relevance, the parquet may protect any transindividual interests or rights, available or unavailable, as the tone is the existence or not of great social value permeating the legal good at stake.